Friday, December 11, 2009
LAD # 21
7The Gospel of wealth is an essay written by Carnegie, a steel and iron baron. Written in 1889 when the economy was booming it was directed towards other wealthy men. It is all about the administration of wealth and how the gap between the rich and the poor cannot be to big. To combat this Carnegie suggests that money be recirculated into the economy by spending a lot. He suggests this can be done in three ways, first left to the decedents. Second put into the public for the good of people or lastly it can just be used by the administrators. Although his heart was in the right place and this essay got much praise not many followers started up this practice. This was a dream that just did not get fullfiled.
Sunday, November 29, 2009
Blog # 20
I really enjoyed this speech by Sojourner Truth, it was direct and straight to the point. Why should women not get the same rights as men? And why not black women to be more specific. Apparently women are classified as useless nobodies helped in every way but Sojourner wasn't but she was still a woman. A man said that females cannot have the same rights as men because Christ was a man not a woman. Sojourner countered with where do you think Christ came from?! that made me laugh...
Blog # 19
"What to a slave is the 4th of July?" was a speech given by Fredrick Douglas, he addressed the issue of our Declaration of Independence applying to everyone except blacks. Buy why? he asked, they were also citizens were they not? He goes on to say that peace, liberty, and prosperity are shared amongst the whites but the blacks who are below them get no such honor. For while the whites rejoice their victories and spoils the blacks get to mourn in what they cannot share in. If the blacks chimed in to this jubilee of happiness than treason is called down upon them. For slavery is the greatest sin and shame of America. The day of the 4th of July is the cruelest of all in the year for it points out the immoral injustices and irony of slavery itself, making it quite apparent of what the whites have and the blacks do not.
Sunday, November 22, 2009
LAD # 18
The Emancipation Proclamation stated that all slaves were now and forever free and that the Executive and military parts of the government will recognized and protect those newfound rights of the people. The Executive branch will stop any rebellions that my occur because of the proclamation. Then Lincoln listed all the states that followed this proclamation, which was all of them
LAD # 17
Lincoln starts off addressing the most important issue of his presidency, the Civil War. He explains that neither side expected the war to be of the magnitude that it was. Lincoln states that much was lost and that the nation during his presidency would hopefully be enough time to bandaged up old wounds in hopes of preserving the union as a whole once again.
LAD # 16
At first the majority of the court chose justice Nelson as the writer as to avoid important controversial topics such as the Missouri Compromise. He went to work not including any topics that could be considered controversial and in his opinion that was what the majority wanted. However when it was presented to the court he was elected out and a new writer was chosen, Chief Justice Roger B. Taney. His writing included all the controversial issues. Tany argured that only citizens have rights to the constitution and because even freed blacks are not citizens the constitution does not apply to them. Thus slaves are property
Friday, November 20, 2009
LAD # 15
Lincoln starts off by quoting some of the Constitution and then jumping right into the fact that this nation is in a civil war. He compares it to a test of whether or not we would persevere as a nation as a WHOLE, Lincoln could have easily let the south go but he refused so as to keep the nation as a UNION. He goes on to say that we cannot sway, must not break for the nation will make it through, and honor the dead for the sacrifices they made were not in vain. But it is for the living to finish their work and let them rest in peace once the war is over. The "government of the people, by the people, for the people shall not perish from the earth" There was no way Lincoln was backing down.
LAD # 14
Abraham Lincoln address several matters in his inaugural address. He start es out by saying how the south seems to be worried that with a republican norther president that their wealth and property will be taken away, he assures them that they will of coarse not be. The next huge aspect that he briefly touches on is the slavery issue, he states that he has not affiliation with either side because it is unlawful for him to pick a side and so he will not. Lincoln goes on to say how he will not infringe upon the states rights or the ways in which they run their own business unless he sees it as a direct attack upon the Constitution itself, then and only then would he use force. He addresses next the issue of returning slaves to their masters after they have escaped to the north, he reads directly out of the constitution to solve that problem. Lincoln states that even though the constitution is a legally binding paper in order to form a more perfect union all parties must still agree on issues. He says that he has no problem to the Corwin amendment which protected slavery in the states that already existed. Lincoln ends his address very sweetly with, "we are not enemies, bur friends. We must not be enemies. Through passion may have strained it must not break our bonds of affection." If I had heard this speech i would feel very emporwerd tworads a more perfect union!
Sunday, November 15, 2009
LAD #13
To start off Calhoun was much to ill to actually speak his most famous speech. He had another senator do it while he was in the room. The main issue he addressed in this speech was the growing problem of sectionalism. Which he thought was mostly attributed to slavery because the north and south had such different opposing views of it. The north hated slavery and the south needed it to run economically smoothly. Another reason for this harsh sectionalism Calhoun claimed was the fact that the north was gaining more and more power, especially in congress. The last was the tariff that the south HATED. Basically it only benefited the north while it economically hurt the south. Calhoun claimed that if these issues were not resolved soon then the Union itself would be in grave danger.
LAD # 12
Polk's war message concerned America and Mexico. Polk wanted to keep friendly relations with Mexico respectively bur whenever the United States sent over an envoy they were very rudely turned away. More specifically the deteriorating relations in Texas. Polk frequently tried peaceful tactics to obtain a diplomatic peace between the two countries. However these did not work out so well and soon fighting broke out and the body count totaled sixteen casualties. It was then that Polk requested military support and funding for troops to help defend Texas and her inhabitants from hostile Mexicans. He concludes that America will never truly trust Mexico.
Thursday, November 12, 2009
LAD # 11
Well to start off this convention was a woman rights movement that lasted over two days, in which they wrote this declaration. I think that it is adorable that they start off this declaration the same exact way that the Declaration of Independence was started off, with one small change, "we hold these truths to be self evident that all men and women are created equal..." Basically a slap in the face for the male population. It then goes on to a list of greivences which to me seem very very unfair... Sheesh woman did not seem to matter very much at all in prominent society, they just sort of sat there and their hubbies did everything, even if it was their land by right! Lastly it gives a list of ways to solve these grivences quickly and cleanly, I feel pretty proud of my Female ancestors for writing this very clever piece that brought unfair and unjust laws to the light.
Sunday, November 1, 2009
LAD# 10.
Basically this was a plan of foreign policy suggested by James Monroe. It was planned around the economic benefit of both America and Britain. To put it bluntly both countries did not want forgien influence other than themselves and Spain. The new Latin American colonies were a great place to trade you see and any other foreign influences could mess that up very easily. So together they made a treaty for the economic benefit of both nations, in hopes that other countries would be scared off. Another big thing that this doctrine settled was the fact that if any eastern powers intervened in western affairs then it was considered a threat to America and thusly if we messed were not aloud to mess with them. Oh, and we were to be considered republics instead of monarchs.
Thursday, October 1, 2009
LAD #7: Washington's Farewell Address.
Washington served forty five years towards the betterment of the United States of America. Instead of starting a third term he stopped at two and delivered a farewell address. He is a big believer in central government and he states that it is the basis of their safety, unity, and liberty. He also REALLY disliked political factions and parties and thought that it turned brother against brother, tearing America apart and making it much more vulnerable to foreign influence. He also warns about public money, how debt should always be paid off and money should not be borrowed without revenue to pay it back. How taxes are needed even though they are very disliked. Warns America about getting into permanent relations with foreign countries (aka don't do what we did in WWI) Lastly he warned about having a big military, like Jefferson he thought it basically invites disaster.
LAD #6: Washington's Proclamation of Neutrality
This proclamation states that America will not participate in the war between the "Powers" They will remain friendly but impartial to all goings on. Any and all citizens who help any side that is fighting will be imprisoned because its against the law under this proclamation. Not just helping, also hindering other nations in this war, thats also prohibited.
Tuesday, September 29, 2009
LAD #5: Federalist #10.
1. There are numerous reasons why destroying a faction is very difficult, starting with the fact that they were somewhat good for early America. Factions protect the minority and with so many out there control of the government doesn't go to just one group because there is so much competition. As long as people have different opinions, amounts of property and money factions will exist.
2. the Federalist #10 states that there are basically two ways to control a faction, removeing its causes and controlling its effects. This can be done many ways, one is majority vote, if the majority is voting then that faction is controlled and at least semi democratic.
2. the Federalist #10 states that there are basically two ways to control a faction, removeing its causes and controlling its effects. This can be done many ways, one is majority vote, if the majority is voting then that faction is controlled and at least semi democratic.
Tuesday, September 22, 2009
Log #4 - Revolution Article
1. The Civil War was consider the first "modern" war mainly because cameras existed.
2. Washington never had any really inspiring speeches, like Lincoln did, concerning the Revolutionary War.
3. Paintings of the time period were not very accurate descriptions of what really happened, for example dead bodies were all over but not in the paintings.
4. Many soldiers went about naked, or partially naked because of lack of supplies.
5. Lastly prisoners were killed on both sides! I'm not talking mayhap a bit here or there, more than 50%! that's ridiculous!
2. Washington never had any really inspiring speeches, like Lincoln did, concerning the Revolutionary War.
3. Paintings of the time period were not very accurate descriptions of what really happened, for example dead bodies were all over but not in the paintings.
4. Many soldiers went about naked, or partially naked because of lack of supplies.
5. Lastly prisoners were killed on both sides! I'm not talking mayhap a bit here or there, more than 50%! that's ridiculous!
Monday, September 21, 2009
LAD #3: Declaration of Independence
1. Democratic Principals: Well in the first sentence the democratic principals are shown, "All men are created equal" thats one of the most democratic ideas of America. The unalienalbe rights came next, life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, whatever that may be. The next one is a biggy, the government derives its powers from the people, and that leads into the fact that if people are unsatisfied with the government then they have the right to abolosh or reform it any way they see fit.
2. The list of greviences against the king, they had a bunch but the ones that are particurally important or relivant were, quartering large bodies of armed troops amoung us. Cutting off our trade with the rest of the world. Imposeing taxes without their consent, impressing sailors. Killed the American people with mercinaries and soliders. Destroying the colonies self government they had created. Lastly the fact that even thought the colonists have offered peace agreements the king has rejected them.
3. Conclusion: The statment that the states are free and independent, they will no longer take orders from the crown. With this new freedom they have the power to wage war, make peace, and control their own economy. The list of names came afterwards in a silent statment of a revolution
2. The list of greviences against the king, they had a bunch but the ones that are particurally important or relivant were, quartering large bodies of armed troops amoung us. Cutting off our trade with the rest of the world. Imposeing taxes without their consent, impressing sailors. Killed the American people with mercinaries and soliders. Destroying the colonies self government they had created. Lastly the fact that even thought the colonists have offered peace agreements the king has rejected them.
3. Conclusion: The statment that the states are free and independent, they will no longer take orders from the crown. With this new freedom they have the power to wage war, make peace, and control their own economy. The list of names came afterwards in a silent statment of a revolution
Thursday, September 10, 2009
LAD #2: John Peter Zenger:
Zenger was a publisher of a weekly newspaper in New York to voice his dislike for a certain governor, in this case William Cosby
Well the controversy was that he was charged with saying "scandales" things about the governor, which HE claimed were false, however libel (what he was charged with) is only valid if the things Zenger were writing happened to be lies. So Hamaltions defense was the truth, his client was not in fact lying about the things he said in his Newspaper
Well this set a precedent against judicial tyranny during libel cases
The lasting effect was the huge victory concerning the freedom of the press in the colonies, not only had Zenger been charged by a royal governor, he also got away scot free.
Well the controversy was that he was charged with saying "scandales" things about the governor, which HE claimed were false, however libel (what he was charged with) is only valid if the things Zenger were writing happened to be lies. So Hamaltions defense was the truth, his client was not in fact lying about the things he said in his Newspaper
Well this set a precedent against judicial tyranny during libel cases
The lasting effect was the huge victory concerning the freedom of the press in the colonies, not only had Zenger been charged by a royal governor, he also got away scot free.
Wednesday, September 9, 2009
LAD #1 Mayflower Compact & Fundamental Orders of Connecticut:
The concepts in the Mayflower Compact include these, the colonists would band together for the common good of each other. And with the witness of god and others they would meet together for the good of their colony, also makeing laws, acts, ordinances, and constitutions. Basically these people banned together for the saftey of numbers and to keep order amoungst themselves to prevent chaos.
Old and New worlds are mixed into the Mayflower Compact in what I think is specified by who they claim as witnesses and where they signed the actual document. They claim God (a given of both worlds) King James, who is old world, also France, Ireland also Old world. They claim these rigths for the land of Virginia, a New world item included. The last New world assosiation they use is Cape-Cod where they signed the actual compact.
A big difference that I first noticed is the length, the Mayflower Compact sort of just promised that the colonists would work together for the better of the colony but the Fundimental Order was very specific on what would happen, and when it would happen. It was also much more organized, with an intro paragraph then numbered laws to be followed.
I think the colonists decided to write everything down in a constitution there and then to prevent "confusion" and/or people getting away with something that they could have origianlly gotten around. This also sets out exactly what is going on and when, just like Hammurabi's Code. All the laws are there for everyone to see and agree upon and if you dont follow those then punishment is iminent.
Wow for this question it is basically in every law, most of them limited years in which people could be in power. This is so new people could be switched out in a couple of years if they were corrupt, thus not in power for life. Basically stopping an Aristocracy from happening, ever. They had a huge fear of this because many of them came to the colonies to escape persecution made by this way of government. They safeguarded from this by creating, limited years in which people could serve, a voteing system so each qualified person could vote. Also the fact that there were many people in power, not just one, so no one person could get to powerful, also creating a primitive version of "checks and balances" Meeting were created to also help with the checks and balances
i have to say, these people were REALLY paraniod about giveing the government to much power, almost a little to much...
Old and New worlds are mixed into the Mayflower Compact in what I think is specified by who they claim as witnesses and where they signed the actual document. They claim God (a given of both worlds) King James, who is old world, also France, Ireland also Old world. They claim these rigths for the land of Virginia, a New world item included. The last New world assosiation they use is Cape-Cod where they signed the actual compact.
A big difference that I first noticed is the length, the Mayflower Compact sort of just promised that the colonists would work together for the better of the colony but the Fundimental Order was very specific on what would happen, and when it would happen. It was also much more organized, with an intro paragraph then numbered laws to be followed.
I think the colonists decided to write everything down in a constitution there and then to prevent "confusion" and/or people getting away with something that they could have origianlly gotten around. This also sets out exactly what is going on and when, just like Hammurabi's Code. All the laws are there for everyone to see and agree upon and if you dont follow those then punishment is iminent.
Wow for this question it is basically in every law, most of them limited years in which people could be in power. This is so new people could be switched out in a couple of years if they were corrupt, thus not in power for life. Basically stopping an Aristocracy from happening, ever. They had a huge fear of this because many of them came to the colonies to escape persecution made by this way of government. They safeguarded from this by creating, limited years in which people could serve, a voteing system so each qualified person could vote. Also the fact that there were many people in power, not just one, so no one person could get to powerful, also creating a primitive version of "checks and balances" Meeting were created to also help with the checks and balances
i have to say, these people were REALLY paraniod about giveing the government to much power, almost a little to much...